Subscribe

RSS Feed (xml)

Powered By

Skin Design:
Free Blogger Skins

Powered by Blogger

Monday, February 12, 2007

**rolling of the eyes**

Found this over at Boudreaux's Blurbs



Even if this "mass" wasn't being celebrated by priestesses there would be so many things wrong with it that I wouldn't even begin to know where to start. Pay close attention and see how many "whacko-ism" you can find. There is a BIG one very early in the video.

4 comments:

Travis said...

I found the "In the name of our creator, and jesus christ, and the holy spirit" to be quite intresting.

If this isn't radical feminism gone crazy, I don't know what is.

Any thoughts on why they would say Jesus Christ instead of son? I know that by saying creator, they are removing gender from the father, and at best remaining gender neutral, and at worst implying womanhood to God the Father, but what does acknowledging Jesus by his name instead of the son, do? Am I reading too much into this?

Chris said...

My only thought could be that in some weird way they think "Jesus Christ" sounds less masculine than "son".

Obvioulsy there's nothing wrong with calling Jesus Christ by his name or calling God "our Creator". But in this case they are blatently trying to remove any masculine image of God.

Mark said...

One word:
feminazis. ;-)

thomas said...

Poor sad deluded creatures.